Great article Derrick. I like my OG 100-400mm but it is a beast to cart about. Hand holding is challenging with the 2X teleconverter, but it is possible. You just need to keep the shutter speed up. It helps that the OM1 does an amazing job with noise control on high ISO jpg images. Topaz AI also works well on the RAW files. The fun begins when you use the 2X teleconverter and the 2X digital zoom for a whopping 3200mm of effective reach! Wow! The addition of the Sync IS will have me very tempted to upgrade.
I think everyones concerns about Olympus and the new ownership can finally be put to bed. They appear to be just as dedicated to us OG Oly users with new models and lens innovations like this one.
Adding lens-based stabilization and sync IS makes this lens significantly more appealing. It's also a great example of the size, weight, and cost benefits of m4/3; the equivalent offerings from Canon, Nikon, and Sony are all $500 more expensive and 1.5 pounds heavier.
Great article Derrick. I like my OG 100-400mm but it is a beast to cart about. Hand holding is challenging with the 2X teleconverter, but it is possible. You just need to keep the shutter speed up. It helps that the OM1 does an amazing job with noise control on high ISO jpg images. Topaz AI also works well on the RAW files. The fun begins when you use the 2X teleconverter and the 2X digital zoom for a whopping 3200mm of effective reach! Wow! The addition of the Sync IS will have me very tempted to upgrade.
I think everyones concerns about Olympus and the new ownership can finally be put to bed. They appear to be just as dedicated to us OG Oly users with new models and lens innovations like this one.
Agreed!
This sounds enticing but I’ll be waiting for image quality comparisons to the m.zuiko 300mm Pro which I already own.
I don't think any lens compares to the 300mm Pro. It is top of class. But for those that don't have one, the 100-400mm is an option worth considering.
Being somewhat mobility challenged, I would love the added reach and lighter weight but must admit that the 300 is pretty sweet!
Adding lens-based stabilization and sync IS makes this lens significantly more appealing. It's also a great example of the size, weight, and cost benefits of m4/3; the equivalent offerings from Canon, Nikon, and Sony are all $500 more expensive and 1.5 pounds heavier.
I think version II really hits the mark with this lens.